Jesus

Many theologians are just playing games. Are you? [Marshall McLuhan Monday]

In a 1970 conversation with Hubert Hoskins (now called “Electronic Consciousness and the Church”), Marshall McLuhan drew a key distinction between perceiving God and conceiving of God. An excerpt:

MCLUHAN: I am myself quite aware that there is a great contrast between perceptual and conceptual confrontation; and I think that the death of Christianity, or the death of God, occurs the moment they become concept. As long as they remain percept, directly involving the perceiver, they are alive.

… The revelation is of thing, not theory. And where revelation reveals actual thingness, you are not dealing with concept. The thingness revealed in Christianity has always been a scandal to the conceptualist. […]This is an issue raised in the Book of Job, where faith and understanding were put at totally opposite poles. Job was not working on a theory but on a direct percept, and all understanding was against him, all concept was against him, he was directly perceiving a reality, revealed to him.

HOSKINS: If what you are saying is right, I still don’t see how such an activity as theology is possible even in theory.

MCLUHAN: It should ideally be the study of the thingness, of the nature of God, since it is a form of contemplation. Insofar as it is theoretic or an intellectual construction, it is a pure game, though perhaps a very attractive one. It’s a game that can equally be played with any oriental theology. It has no more relevance to Christian theology than it has to Hindu theology.

McLuhan goes on to remind Hoskins that the Scribes and Pharisees “had too many theories to be able to perceive anything.”

His point, of course, is a central one: Do you perceive God as a real, true being? Alive? Or, do you conceive of God as possible or probable?

This could be metaphorized in G.K. Chesterton’s, “Let your religion be less of a theory and more of a love affair.” You cannot have a love relationship with an idea. Relationships require Someones.

So, Christians, are you living your lives in relationship? Or are you too busy playing theoretical games?

P.S. One place where you can read “Electronic Consciousness and the Church” in its entirety: The Medium and the Light: Reflections on Religion. (A compilation of McLuhan edited by his son, Eric, and Jacek Szklarek.)

About these ads

One thought on “Many theologians are just playing games. Are you? [Marshall McLuhan Monday]

  1. This is fascinating because I was reading St. Teresa of Avila this weekend and she was talking about how important it is for beginners in the spiritual life to experiencing God in a tangible way through prayer. This gives them initial motivation to know him better. She says we must first know him intellectually because you can’t love someone or something you don’t know. But then, that should be backed up by an experiential knowing through prayer.

    If God remains purely on the level of theory, how can you enter into relationship with him? There has to be a knowing of him as Person and Being before entering into relationship with him…a certain kind of knowing is necessary. Very cool.

    Thanks Angela!

Add to the Conversation:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s